OBJETIVO: Comparar dados clínicos-laboratoriais em portadores de estenose mitral submetidos à comissurotomia ou valvoplastia por cateter-balão, obtidos ao longo de 5 anos de acompanhamento. MÉTODOS: Foram acompanhados, prospectivamente, 81 pacientes no pré (PRÉ), imediatamente após o procedimento (POI), e ao longo de cinco anos (PO12M, PO24M,..., PO60M) e randomizados em dois grupos: GC: 37 pacientes (32,4 ± 7,2 anos e 89,2% mulheres) e GV: 44 pacientes (32,9 ± 9,5 anos e 90,9% mulheres). A avaliação compreendeu: classe funcional, ocorrência de eventos, eletrocardiograma e ecodopplercardiograma. RESULTADOS: Houve melhora expressiva da classe funcional na maioria dos pacientes, três casos do GC e do GV estavam em classe funcional III no PO60M. Não houve diferença em relação ao gradiente mitral entre os grupos. Houve diferença das médias de área valvar mitral entre os grupos durante toda avaliação. Não ocorreram óbitos. No POI do GC observamos 3 casos com insuficiência mitral (IM) moderada, 3 com sangramento (1 reoperado) e, no GV, 4 casos com IM moderada, 1 com IM importante, 2 com tamponamento cardíaco, 1 caso necessitou cirurgia por IM importante. Ao longo de 60 meses, no GV, 9 casos evoluiram com IM moderada ou importante e no GC, 6 casos evoluiram com IM moderada ou importante e outros dois necessitaram cirurgia por dupla disfunção mitral. CONCLUSÃO: Ambos os métodos obtiveram 100% de sucesso com baixa taxa de complicações. No seguimento, houve elevação discreta do gradiente mitral e queda de área valvar mitral em ambos os grupos.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and laboratory data in patients with mitral stenosis undergoing open commissurotomy or balloon valvuloplasty, who were followed up for 5 years. METHODS: Eighty-one patients were prospectively assessed prior to the procedure (PRE) and immediately after the procedure, in the immediate postoperative period (IPO), and followed up yearly for 5 years (PO12M, PO24M, PO36M, PO48M, and PO60M). They were randomized into the following 2 groups: GC (group undergoing open commissurotomy): 37 patients (32.4 ± 7.2 years; 89.2% females); and GV (group undergoing balloon valvuloplasty): 44 patients (32.9 ± 9.5 years; 90.9% females). The patients' assessment comprised the following items: functional class, occurrence of events, electrocardiography, and Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: A significant improvement in functional class occurred in most patients. Three patients in GC and in GV were in functional class III in PO60M. No difference in the mitral gradient was observed between the groups. A difference in the mean mitral valve areas was observed between the groups during the entire evaluation. No patients died. In regard to the IPO of GC, 3 patients had moderate mitral insufficiency (MI), and 3 had bleeding (1 was reoperated upon). In the IPO of GV, 4 patients had moderate MI, 1 had severe MI, 2 had cardiac tamponade, and 1 patient required surgery due to severe MI. Over 60 months, 9 GV patients evolved to moderate or severe MI, while 6 GC patients evolved to moderate or severe MI, and 2 other GC patients required surgery due to double mitral dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The rate of success in open mitral commissurotomy and balloon mitral valvuloplasty was 100%, and the rate of complications was low. During follow-up, a mild elevation in mitral gradient and a drop in mitral valve area were observed in both groups.

Intracoronary brachytherapy using beta or gamma radiation is currently the most efficient type of therapy for preventing the recurrence of coronary in-stent restenosis. Its implementation depends on the interaction among interventionists, radiotherapists, and physicists to assure the safety and quality of the method. The authors report the pioneering experience in Brazil of the treatment of 2 patients with coronary in-stent restenosis, in whom beta radiation was used as part of the international multicenter randomized PREVENT study (Proliferation REduction with Vascular ENergy Trial). The procedures were performed rapidly and did not require significant modifications in the traditional techniques used for conventional angioplasty. Alteration in the radiological protection devices of the hemodynamic laboratory were also not required, showing that intracoronary brachytherapy using beta radiation can be incorporated into the interventional tools of cardiology in our environment.

OBJETIVO: Comparar resultados imediatos e após 12 meses de seguimento entre valvoplastia por balão e comissurotomia na estenose mitral. MÉTODOS: Oitenta e oito portadores de estenose mitral sintomáticos com anatomia favorável foram randomizados nos dois grupos. Todos os pacientes submeteram-se a avaliação clínica e Doppler ecocardiográfica antes, imediatamente após e 12 meses depois do procedimento. RESULTADOS: Gradiente médio mitral (mmHg) diminuiu (p<0,001) de 12,18±5,84 para 5,80±2,66 no grupo comissurotomia (GC) e de 11,66±6,13 para 4,98±2,40 (p<0,001) no grupo valvuloplastia (GV). Área valvar mitral (cm²) aumentou de 0,98±0,21 para 2,52±0,46 no GC e de 1,05±0,25 para 2,18±0,40 no GV (p<0,001). Em ambos os grupos ocorreu uma diminuição discreta na área valvar mitral ao final do acompanhamento. Não ocorreram óbitos. Um paciente do GV apresentou insuficiência mitral significativa e necessitou tratamento cirúrgico. Aos 12 meses de acompanhamento todos os pacientes do GC e 97,7% dos pacientes do GV estavam em classe funcional I ou II (NYHA). CONCLUSÃO: Os procedimentos foram seguros e mostraram melhora semelhante no gradiente mitral e classe funcional. A área valvar mitral aumentou expressivamente mais no GC, e apresentou, também, uma redução mais significativa após 12 meses. A maioria dos pacientes não alterou a classe funcional no acompanhamento.

PURPOSE: To compare immediate and late (12 months) follow up of clinical and Doppler echocardiographic results between percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty and open commissurotomy in a prospective and randomized trial. METHODS: Eighty eight symptomatic patients with severe mitral stenosis and favorable anatomy were randomized in a prospective trial comparing the two procedures. All patients were submitted to clinical and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation before the procedures and immediate and twelve months thereafter. RESULTS: Mean mitral gradient (mmHg) decreased from 12.2±5.8 to 5.80±2.7 (p<0.001) in commissurotomy group (CG) and from 11.7±6.1 to 5.0±2.4 (p<0.001) in the balloon valvuloplasty group (VG). Mitral valve area (cm²) increased from 0.98±0.21 to 2.52±0.46 in CG and from 1.05±0.25 to 2.18±0.40 in VG (p<0.001). In both groups there was a slight decrease in mitral valve area at 12 month follow-up. There was no death in either group. One patient in the VG had moderate mitral regurgitation and underwent surgery. At the 12 month follow-up, all patients in CG and 97.7% of patients in VG were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. CONCLUSION: Both procedures were safe and showed similar immediate improvement in mitral gradient and functional class. Mitral valve area had a greater increase immediately after commissurotomy, however there was a significantly greater reduction in the CG after 12 months of follow-up, when compared to balloon valvuloplasty. In both groups, mitral gradient remained reduced and most patients did not change functional class during the follow-up.